Shared Decision-Making Note (Carotid Revascularization)

Standalone shared decision-making documentation for carotid revascularization decisions (CEA vs CAS/TCAR vs medical therapy). Structured to meet CMS requirements for SDM before carotid artery stenting, with emphasis on d…

Document Type

clinical note / Risk Assessment Note

Specialties

Vascular Surgery
Created by Augustun

Template Preview

Date/Time: [Date and time of SDM discussion]

Location: [clinic / inpatient / telehealth]

Author: [Name, credentials, role]

Decision Focus: [One-sentence statement of the specific decision, e.g., "Revascularization approach for symptomatic right ICA stenosis"]

Participants and Capacity

Patient: [Patient name or "patient"] — [has decision-making capacity / lacks capacity: reason and assessment timing]

Surrogate/POA: [Name, relationship, basis for authority] (If applicable; omit if patient has capacity and is deciding independently)

Others present: [Family/friends: names and relationships / none]

Interpreter: [Language and modality / not needed]

[Patient/surrogate] had opportunity to ask questions and was free from coercion. [Key questions or concerns raised, if any]

Clinical Context

(Include only details that materially affect option comparison. If stenosis severity or symptom status is uncertain, explicitly state what is pending and note that the decision is preliminary.)

  • Carotid disease: [Side], [vessel], [stenosis severity and measurement method], [imaging source and date]
  • Symptom status: [Symptomatic: qualifying event, date, residual deficits / Asymptomatic]
  • Current medical therapy: [Antiplatelet agent(s)], [statin intensity], [BP control status], [smoking status], [other relevant risk factor management]
  • Factors affecting option selection: [Age], [cardiac risk], [renal function], [DAPT tolerance: confirmed / intolerance history / unknown], [neck anatomy: prior surgery, radiation, high lesion], [arch anatomy if relevant to stenting], [other pertinent factors]
  • Pending items: [Tests or information awaited that may affect final decision] (Omit if none)

Options Discussed

(Document all medically reasonable options. CMS requires discussion of CEA, CAS/TCAR, and optimal medical therapy before CAS. If an option is not appropriate for this patient, state why rather than omitting.)

Optimal Medical Therapy Alone

  • Components: [Antiplatelet plan], [statin and lipid goals], [BP targets], [smoking cessation], [other interventions]
  • Expected benefit: [Stroke risk reduction with OMT]; Residual risk: [Estimated ipsilateral stroke risk without revascularization]
  • Surveillance: [Duplex interval], [clinical follow-up schedule]
  • Suitability for this patient: [Factors favoring or disfavoring OMT alone]

Carotid Endarterectomy (CEA)

  • Expected benefit: [Stroke prevention benefit for this patient given symptom status and stenosis severity]
  • Material risks discussed: [Stroke], [death], [MI], [cranial nerve injury: nerves at risk, transient vs permanent], [wound/airway complications], [other patient-specific risks]
  • Suitability for this patient: [Anatomy considerations: hostile neck, prior radiation, high lesion], [anesthesia considerations], [cardiac risk], [other factors favoring or disfavoring CEA]

Carotid Artery Stenting (CAS/TCAR)

  • Approach considered: [Transfemoral CAS / TCAR]
  • Benefits: [Less invasive], [shorter recovery], [avoids neck incision and cranial nerve risk], [other patient-specific benefits]
  • Material risks discussed: [Periprocedural stroke/embolization], [access complications], [contrast-related risks], [bradycardia/hypotension], [restenosis], [other patient-specific risks]
  • DAPT requirement: [Agents and duration planned]; [Tolerance: confirmed / unknown—requires resolution before final decision]
  • Suitability for this patient: [Age considerations], [arch/access anatomy], [renal function], [other factors favoring or disfavoring CAS]

Deferral or Watchful Waiting

(Include if discussed as distinct option; omit if not applicable)

  • Rationale: [Clinical reasons to defer]
  • Plan: [Duration], [surveillance], [criteria prompting intervention]

Clinician Recommendation

[Recommended approach: CEA / transfemoral CAS / TCAR / OMT alone / true equipoise]. [One to two sentences linking recommendation to patient-specific clinical factors and guideline considerations. If equipoise, specify which factors are preference-sensitive.]

Patient Goals and Preferences

(Include at least one direct quote or clearly attributed statement.)

  • Stated priorities: [Patient's goals relevant to this decision] — "[Direct quote capturing key value or preference]"
  • Risk tolerance: [Prioritizes stroke prevention vs avoiding procedures; tolerance for procedural risk vs long-term risk]
  • Practical considerations: [DAPT willingness], [recovery time concerns], [caregiver/support considerations]
  • If preferences unclear: [Reason and supportive steps taken: decision aids, additional counseling, caregiver involvement] (Omit if preferences were clearly articulated)

Assessment of Understanding

  • Teach-back: [What patient/surrogate was able to explain back about options, benefits, risks, and tradeoffs; gaps identified and clarified]
  • Key questions asked: [Salient questions and how addressed]
  • Educational materials: [Decision aids, handouts, diagrams provided] (Omit if none)
  • SDM structure: [Single visit / multiple visits: summarize prior discussions if applicable]

Decision and Next Steps

Decision: [Proceed with CEA / Proceed with transfemoral CAS / Proceed with TCAR / Continue OMT alone / Defer decision pending specific information / Patient declines intervention]

Rationale: [One sentence linking clinical factors and patient preferences to chosen approach]

If proceeding with revascularization: Timing: [urgent / elective; target window if symptomatic]. Pre-procedure requirements: [labs, cardiac clearance, anesthesia evaluation, DAPT initiation]. Scheduling: [target date or next steps].

If not proceeding now: OMT optimization: [specific actions]. Surveillance: [duplex interval, clinic follow-up]. Return precautions: [stroke/TIA symptoms requiring emergency evaluation].

Conditional items to resolve: [e.g., confirm stenosis severity, DAPT tolerance, renal optimization, imaging review] (Omit if decision is final)

CMS SDM Attestation

(Complete when CAS/TCAR is planned, especially for Medicare beneficiaries.)

  • [x] Indication criteria met: symptom status and stenosis severity documented
  • [x] All required options discussed: CEA, CAS/TCAR, and optimal medical therapy
  • [x] Patient-specific risks and benefits discussed for each option
  • [x] Clinical guideline considerations integrated
  • [x] Patient preferences and priorities elicited and incorporated
  • [x] SDM completed prior to planned procedure date

This SDM documentation does not replace the facility's required procedure consent form.

Want to use this template?

Copy it into your workflow, or book a demo to see Augustun draft notes like this automatically.