Civil Capacity Evaluation Report (Guardianship, Testamentary, or Medical)
A forensic template for civil capacity evaluations addressing guardianship, testamentary, or medical decision-making questions. Structured around decision-specific functional abilities mapped to legal elements, with requ…
Document Type
interpretation / results report / Functional Capacity Evaluation Report
Specialties
Template Preview
Report Date: [Date report finalized]
Evaluation Date(s): [Date(s) of evaluation sessions]
Location: [Evaluation location and setting]
Examinee Name: [Full name]
Date of Birth: [DOB]
Primary Language: [Language]
Interpreter Used: [Yes / No] (If yes, specify type, name/ID if available, and languages.)
Retaining Party/Requestor: [Court / Counsel / Agency / Other]
Referral Source: [Court order / Counsel letter / Agency request / Other]
Evaluator: [Name, credentials, license number, contact information]
Case Information: [Court, jurisdiction, case number, caption] (State not applicable if none provided.)
Referral Question(s)
[Exact capacity question(s) as received] (Reproduce verbatim in quotation marks. Identify the decision(s) and time point(s) at issue.)
Capacity Modules Requested: [Medical decision-making / Guardianship or conservatorship of person / Guardianship or conservatorship of estate / Testamentary capacity] (List all that apply.)
Evaluator Role and Disclosures
[Statement that this is a forensic, non-treatment evaluation; identification of client versus examinee; affirmation of objectivity and independence]
Prior relationships or conflicts: [Description of any prior contact with examinee or parties, or potential conflicts of interest; if none, state none]
Qualifications: [Relevant training, licensure, board certifications, and capacity evaluation experience]
Notice and Consent
[Documentation of what examinee was told about purpose, requester, intended uses, report recipients, and limits of confidentiality]
Participation: [Voluntary / Court-ordered] Examinee response: [Agreed / Partially agreed / Refused]
Refusals or limits: [Portions refused, what was explained, and impact on evaluation] (Omit if none.)
Legal Standard and Decision Context
Jurisdiction: [State/Province/Country]
Legal standard: [Statute or case law citation with date]
Elements of the standard:
- [Element 1]
- [Element 2]
- [Element 3]
(Add or remove elements as appropriate. If the legal standard was not provided, document efforts to obtain it and note any provisional clinical framework used pending confirmation.)
Sources of Information
- Records reviewed: [Document titles, providers, date ranges] (Note if critical records were requested but unavailable.)
- Interviews conducted: [Interviewees, roles, dates, durations, formats]
- Behavioral observations: [Settings and circumstances observed]
- Testing and measures administered: [Instruments and brief purpose] (Include performance validity measures if used.)
- Decision-specific materials presented: [Educational materials, consent forms, decision aids, teach-back prompts]
(When presenting contested facts throughout this report, label source as: observed, self-reported, collateral-reported, or documented in records.)
Methods and Procedures
Evaluation conditions: [Setting, fatigue, pain, medication timing, sensory or motor limitations, environmental factors]
Language and accommodations: [Language used; supports such as repetition, simplified materials, visual aids, teach-back, breaks, assistive devices, support person present]
Interview and testing: [Sequence and content focus of interviews; tests administered with rationale; any deviations from standard administration]
Behavioral Observations and Mental Status
- Appearance and behavior: [Grooming, hygiene, posture, motor activity, eye contact]
- Cooperation and effort: [Engagement, persistence, performance validity concerns]
- Speech and language: [Rate, volume, articulation, fluency, comprehension, word-finding]
- Affect and mood: [Range, reactivity, congruence; reported mood]
- Thought process and content: [Organization, coherence; delusions or overvalued ideas relevant to the decision]
- Perception: [Hallucinations or misperceptions] (Include only if relevant.)
- Cognitive functioning: [Attention, orientation, memory, executive functions, calculation, visuospatial abilities; note fluctuations during encounter]
- Reliability: [Consistency across sources and sessions; response validity indicators; factors limiting reliability]
Illustrative quotes: [Brief direct quotes demonstrating decisional abilities or deficits] (Use sparingly and in context.)
Relevant History
(Include only details directly supporting capacity analysis.)
- Medical/neurological: [Neurocognitive disorders, cerebrovascular disease, TBI, seizures, delirium risks, sensory impairments]
- Psychiatric: [Diagnoses, hospitalizations, psychosis, mood or anxiety disorders]
- Substance use: [Substances, patterns, recent use or withdrawal risks, treatment history]
- Medications: [Current medications with cognitive or behavioral effects; adherence]
- Functional trajectory: [ADL/IADL changes over time]
- Social and supports: [Living situation, caregivers, advance directives, POA]
- Legal/financial context: [Prior guardianship petitions, exploitation concerns, fiduciary arrangements]
Functional Status and Supports
- ADLs: [Bathing, dressing, toileting, feeding, ambulation, continence]
- IADLs: [Medication management, finances, shopping, cooking, housekeeping, transportation, communication]
- Safety: [Falls, wandering, self-neglect, exploitation risk, emergency response capacity]
- Healthcare navigation: [Appointment management, prescription refills, understanding instructions]
- Financial management: [Paying bills, budgeting, recognizing scams, record-keeping]
- Existing supports: [Informal caregivers, formal services, legal instruments, case management]
- Potential supports to enhance capacity: [Accommodations, assistive services, environmental modifications]
Medical Decision-Making Capacity Analysis
(Include only if referral requests capacity for a specific medical decision.)
Decision at issue: [Treatment / Procedure / Refusal / Disposition] (Identify time point.)
Information presented: [Condition, options, risks, benefits, alternatives, consequences of refusal; method and language level used]
- Expressing a choice: [Clear / Inconsistent / Unable] — [Evidence of clarity, consistency, stability]
- Understanding: [Evidence examinee can restate condition and options in own words]
- Appreciation: [Application to self; acknowledgment of illness and consequences; recognition of treatment role]
- Reasoning: [Ability to compare options, provide rationale, weigh risks and benefits consistent with values]
Voluntariness: [Presence or absence of undue pressure, fear, or external control]
Threshold: [Note if heightened certainty applied for high-stakes decision] (Include only if applicable.)
Opinion: [Capacity present / Capacity not present / Indeterminate] — [Impaired abilities if lacking capacity; supports that could remediate; reassessment timeframe]
Guardianship/Conservatorship Capacity Analysis
(Include only if referral requests evaluation for guardianship or conservatorship.)
Scope: [Guardianship of person / Conservatorship of estate / Both] — [Specific domains at issue]
- Essential needs with supports: [Abilities to meet health, safety, housing, financial, and personal needs with appropriate supports]
- Abilities retained: [Retained capacities with examples]
- Limitations: [Deficits with concrete examples; distinguish incapacity from unwise choices]
- Specific risks without intervention: [Foreseeable harms, likelihood, severity]
- Less restrictive alternatives: [Options tried or considered; why insufficient or sufficient]
Opinion: [Not indicated / Limited guardianship recommended / Plenary guardianship recommended / Insufficient information] — [Domains to retain versus transfer; triggers for restoration review]
Reversible contributors: [Interventions that could restore or enhance capacity; reassessment timeframe]
Testamentary Capacity Analysis
(Include only if referral requests evaluation of will-making capacity.)
Time point anchored: [Date of execution / Date of instructions / Retrospective]
Testamentary act and estate context: [Document type, asset categories, intended beneficiaries; unexpected inclusions or exclusions described neutrally]
- Understands nature of a will: [Observations and quotes supporting or refuting]
- Knowledge of property: [Awareness of assets and approximate value or categories]
- Natural objects of bounty: [Recognition of close relations and potential beneficiaries]
- Rational plan of distribution: [Coherent, stable rationale linking assets to beneficiaries]
Impact of conditions on elements: [Direct effects of psychiatric or cognitive conditions on above elements; diagnosis alone is insufficient]
Undue influence: [Susceptibility, opportunity, motive, corroborating indicators] (Include only if red flags present.)
Opinion: [Capacity present / Capacity not present / Unable to determine] — [If indeterminate, specify additional information needed]
Clinical Formulation
[Synthesis explaining functional strengths and weaknesses; working diagnoses; implicated cognitive domains; interaction with medical, psychiatric, and situational factors; expected course] (Link conclusions to functional evidence; do not determine capacity by diagnosis alone.)
Opinions and Conclusions
(Provide separate statement for each decision or domain evaluated.)
- Decision/Domain: [Specify] — Opinion: [Capacity present / Not present / Indeterminate] — [Impaired abilities or elements; key supporting findings; supports that could improve capacity; reassessment timeframe] (Include "to a reasonable degree of medical/psychological certainty" if jurisdictionally expected.)
(Add additional items as needed.)
Recommendations
- [Medical or psychiatric treatments to improve cognition]
- [Communication accommodations and decision aids]
- [Supported decision-making arrangements with safeguards]
- [Environmental or service supports]
- [Legal or administrative tools]
- [Reassessment plan and triggers]
Limitations
[Specific limitations affecting confidence in opinions: missing records, unavailable collateral, time constraints, acute illness, one-sided referral data, retrospective constraints, examinee refusal] (For each opinion, specify how limitations affect confidence.)
Signature
Evaluator Signature: [Signature]
Credentials: [Degrees, certifications]
License Number: [License number and jurisdiction]
Date Signed: [Date]
Attachments: [CV / Test score appendix / Records list / Decision aids used / Other] (List if applicable.)
Want to use this template?
Copy it into your workflow, or book a demo to see Augustun draft notes like this automatically.
Related templates
interpretation / results report
504 Accommodation Evaluation Summary
interpretation / results report
ABPM Interpretation Report (Pediatrics)
interpretation / results report
Actigraphy Interpretation Report
interpretation / results report
Ambulatory ECG Monitor Interpretation Report (Holter/Event/Patch)
interpretation / results report
Anorectal Manometry Interpretation Report
interpretation / results report
Assistive Technology Assessment Report