The impression is the product
Referring clinicians and payers read the impression. A clinic-style SOAP is the wrong genre for a CCTA or mammogram.
Radiology
Structured impressions, critical results, and MQSA letters — CAD-RADS, contrast reactions, and panic notifications drafted as real reports, not clinic SOAP.
The problem
Referring clinicians and payers read the impression. A clinic-style SOAP is the wrong genre for a CCTA or mammogram.
Who was notified, when, and what was said have to be in a communication note. A buried addendum fails Joint Commission-style review.
Lay language and BI-RADS category have to match the report. That letter is not optional.
How Augustun fits
CCTA and other study reports keep technique, findings, and structured scores (including CAD-RADS) in a radiology format.
Contrast reactions and critical-result notifications are dedicated records with time and recipient.
MQSA lay-summary letters are drafted from the interpreted study.
CCTA/CAD-RADS reports, contrast-reaction notes, critical-result notifications, and mammography lay letters.
Outcomes
30min
Typical time recovered per shift on letters and communication notes
Critical
Panic results documented with time and recipient
400+
EHRs/PACS-adjacent workflows via browser extension
FAQ
It drafts structured reports and communication notes from the case discussion. Many groups still finalize in the reporting system — Augustun cuts the letters, reactions, and panic-call documentation around that workflow.
Yes. Recipient, time, and findings communicated are structured into a notification note.
Yes. Lay-language letters are drafted from the interpreted mammogram for you to review.
Free templates
Ready-to-use SOAP, BIRP, and specialty note templates you can copy into your workflow today.
Start free — no credit card required. Most clinicians are live in under 10 minutes.
Ask AI about Augustun: