Optometry

An AI scribe built for optometry

Comprehensive exams, dry eye, and fields — refraction, 92004/92014-level detail, and ophthalmic prior-auths drafted from the lane.

The problem

What slows optometry down

VA, refraction, binocularity, and ocular health have to be in the note or 92004/92014 looks like a refraction-only visit.

Topography and fields need interpretation, not ‘test done’. That is what the ophthalmology referral and the payer both read.

SPEED/OSDI, meibography comments, and stepwise therapy have to be consistent visit to visit.

How Augustun fits

Exam conversations capture symptoms, CL wear, and findings into a structured evaluation note.

Visual-field and corneal topography interpretations are drafted as reports, not one-liners.

Ocular ICD-10 and exam/testing CPTs are proposed from documented elements.

Dry-eye evaluations, VF reports, topography reports, and ophthalmic prior-auth requests.

Outcomes

Avg

Hours saved per optometrist per day on exam notes and reports

CPT

92014

Exam elements structured to support comprehensive-visit coding

Coverage

400+

EHRs via browser extension (RevolutionEHR, Crystal, Epic)

FAQ

Yes. History, exam elements, and plan discussed in the lane are structured into an optometric evaluation note.

Yes. Those findings are drafted into standalone interpretation reports.

Yes. Clinical criteria discussed in the visit are drafted into a prior-auth request you review.

Free templates

Ready-to-use SOAP, BIRP, and specialty note templates you can copy into your workflow today.

Start free — no credit card required. Most clinicians are live in under 10 minutes.