Worksite/Ergonomic Assessment Report

A comprehensive template for documenting workplace ergonomic evaluations, job demands analyses, and risk assessments. Structured around the hierarchy of controls framework with sections for task analysis, physical demand…

Document Type

interpretation / results report / Functional Capacity Evaluation Report

Specialties

Occupational Therapy
Created by Augustun

Template Preview

Worksite / Ergonomic Assessment Report

Evaluator: [Name, credentials, organization, phone, email]

Assessment Date: [Date]

Report Date: [Date]

Assessment Type: [on-site workplace / simulated or off-site / remote or virtual review]

Worker: [Name; DOB or Employee ID; contact if applicable] (Omit this field if no specific worker is the subject of the assessment)

Employer: [Company; site/location; department; supervisor contact]

Job Title: [Job title]

Work Schedule: [Shift; hours/day; days/week; overtime expectations]

Referral Source: [clinician / case manager / insurer / employer / HR / self-referral] (Include name, role, and contact if provided)

Confidentiality: [Statement identifying intended recipients, basis for disclosure, and note that this report focuses on job demands and functional recommendations rather than serving as a comprehensive medical record; include any restrictions on further distribution]

Purpose and Referral Questions

[Reason for assessment, such as injury concerns, return-to-work planning, workstation setup, high-risk task evaluation, or post-injury job match]

  • [Referral question 1] (List 2–5 specific questions to be answered)
  • [Referral question 2]
  • [Referral question 3] (Only include if provided)
  • [Referral question 4] (Only include if provided)
  • [Referral question 5] (Only include if provided)

Scope Boundaries: [Areas not evaluated, such as medical causation, non-work activities, or unrelated tasks] (Omit if no scope limitations)

Sources of Information

  • [Worker interview: date, topics covered]
  • [Supervisor/management interview: date, topics covered]
  • [Documents reviewed: job descriptions, policies, SOPs, prior reports with titles and dates]
  • [Photos/videos: dates, whether representative of typical or peak conditions]
  • [Direct measurements: tools/instruments used, parameters measured, units]
  • [Visual estimations: items estimated, rationale]
  • [Self-report data: items provided by worker or employer]
  • [Key information unavailable and reason] (Only include if something requested was not available)

Job Description and Essential Functions

[Brief role statement describing the job's primary purpose]

  • [Essential function 1]: [Critical / Modifiable]; [Frequency]; [Performance standards or output requirements]
  • [Essential function 2]: [Critical / Modifiable]; [Frequency]; [Notes]
  • [Essential function 3]: [Critical / Modifiable]; [Frequency]; [Notes] (Add additional items as needed)

Schedule/Exposure Context: [Shift pattern, break structure, rotation schedule, peak demand periods]

Task Analysis and Risk Assessment

(Create a subsection for each significant task. Indicate sampling strategy, number of cycles observed, and whether observations represent typical or peak demand.)

[Task 1]: [Task name]

  • Task description: [Concise narrative of steps and workflow]
  • Frequency and duration: [Cycles/hour; minutes per cycle; total task time per shift]
  • Loads and forces: [Weights handled; lift/lower heights; carry distances; push/pull forces; grip demands] (Indicate whether values are direct measurements, visual estimates, or self-report)
  • Postures observed: [Trunk flexion/rotation; shoulder elevation; wrist deviation; kneeling/squatting; overhead work; neck posture] (Include angles if measured)
  • Repetition characteristics: [Cycle time; repetitions per minute; duty cycle; pauses]
  • Tools and equipment: [Tools used; handle design; trigger type; activation force]
  • Environmental factors: [Floor surface; reach distances; lighting; noise; temperature; space constraints; vibration]
  • Sampling: [Number of observations/cycles; time windows; typical vs. peak conditions]

Standardized Tool(s) Applied: (Only include tools actually used)

  • [Tool name] — Inputs: [Key inputs measured]; Output: [Score/index]; Interpretation: [Risk level]; Limitations: [Applicability constraints]

Primary Risk Factors:

  • Forceful exertion: [Description and severity]
  • Repetition: [Description and severity]
  • Awkward posture: [Description and severity]
  • Static/sustained postures: [Description and duration]
  • Contact stress: [Locations and conditions]
  • Vibration: [Type and exposure]
  • Organizational/environmental: [Pace, staffing, scheduling, training, environmental conditions]

Prioritization Rationale: [Explanation based on severity, frequency, exposure duration, and feasibility of control]

[Task 2]: [Task name]

(Repeat same structure for each additional significant task)

Physical Demands Summary

  • Postural tolerance: [Standing duration; walking duration; sitting duration; static postures; positional changes; kneeling/squatting tolerances]
  • Material handling: [Lift/lower weights by height zone; carry distances/weights; frequency; push/pull forces and distances]
  • Upper extremity demands: [Repetition intensity; grip/pinch force requirements; fine motor task duration; trigger use frequency]
  • Mobility requirements: [Climbing; ladder use; confined spaces; crawling; floor surface variability]
  • Other demands: [Hearing/vision requirements; PPE usage; environmental exposures] (Only include if relevant)

Worker Observations

(Include this section only when a specific worker was observed; omit entirely for job-demands-only analyses)

  • Worker-reported symptoms: [Symptoms and timing relative to tasks, using neutral language] (Do not include diagnoses)
  • Observed functional performance: [Pace changes; guarded movements; compensatory strategies; assistance required]
  • Trial modifications tested: [Modification; what was changed; immediate effect; worker feedback] (Only include if applicable)

Findings

Executive Summary:

  • [Key finding 1] (Include 5–10 key points using plain language for mixed audience)
  • [Key finding 2]
  • [Key finding 3]
  • [Key finding 4]
  • [Key finding 5]

Observations:

  • [Factual observation with measurement method] (Quantify where possible)
  • [Factual observation]

Interpretations:

  • [Interpretation linking observation to risk category and likely driver]
  • [Interpretation]

(Do not state medical causation or diagnoses; reference medical information only as worker-reported or per treating clinician with date)

Recommendations

(Organize by task and hierarchy of controls; assign priority and timeframe for each)

[Task]: [Task name]

Engineering Controls (preferred):

  • [Recommendation title]

    • Risk factor addressed: [Force / repetition / posture / static / contact stress / vibration / organizational]
    • Rationale: [How this reduces exposure/risk]
    • Implementation: [Specifications, dimensions, product type, placement, vendor steps]
    • Feasibility: [Cost range; lead time; installation constraints]
    • Responsible party: [Role or department]
    • Expected benefit: [Quantified or qualitative reduction]
    • Effectiveness measure: [How success will be verified]
    • Priority: [High / Medium / Low] | Timeframe: [Immediate / 30 days / 90 days]

Administrative / Work-Practice Controls:

  • [Recommendation title]

    • Risk factor addressed: [Category]
    • Rationale: [Exposure reduction mechanism]
    • Implementation: [Task rotation; micro-break protocol; pacing; staffing; SOP updates]
    • Training required: [Topic, audience, duration] (Training should not substitute for feasible engineering controls; omit if none)
    • Responsible party: [Role or department]
    • Expected benefit: [Benefit]
    • Effectiveness measure: [Metric or observation method]
    • Priority: [High / Medium / Low] | Timeframe: [Immediate / 30 days / 90 days]

PPE (supplemental only):

  • [Recommendation title]

    • Hazard addressed: [Type]
    • Selection: [Type/specification]
    • Limitations: [Why PPE is supplemental, not primary]
    • Responsible party: [Role or department]
    • Priority: [High / Medium / Low] | Timeframe: [Immediate / 30 days / 90 days]

Quick fixes implemented during assessment: [What was changed; immediate response; feedback] (Only include if applicable)

Return-to-Work Plan

(Include only when requested or when work restrictions are provided; omit entirely for prevention-focused assessments)

Basis for plan: [Treating clinician restrictions with date / functional testing results / observed tolerance during assessment]

  • Phase 1: [Effective dates]
    • Work schedule: [Hours/day; days/week; breaks]
    • Permitted tasks: [List]
    • Prohibited tasks: [List]
    • Quantified restrictions: [Lift/lower limits by height zone; carry limits; push/pull limits; positional tolerances; repetitive task limits]
    • Required accommodations/equipment: [List]
    • Criteria to progress: [Objective measures, symptom trends, re-evaluation date]
  • Phase 2: [Effective dates] (Add additional phases as needed)
    • [Same structure as Phase 1]

Communication plan: [Recipients of RTW plan; responsible party for scheduling follow-up; timeline]

Follow-Up Plan

  • Timing and method: [Date range; on-site vs. remote; responsible party]
  • Outcome metrics: [Implementation completion; exposure re-measurement; symptom trends; operational metrics; injury/near-miss monitoring]
  • Reassessment triggers: [Process/equipment changes; symptom escalation; failure to achieve expected benefit]

Limitations and Assumptions

  • [Observation time constraints or schedule limitations]
  • [Representativeness of observed conditions and known deviations]
  • [Reliance on estimates or self-report]
  • [Equipment not available for measurement]
  • [Differences between simulated and actual environments] (If applicable)
  • [Key assumptions used in calculations or conclusions]

Attachments

  • [Task photos or annotated images]
  • [Measurement worksheets]
  • [Risk scoring summaries]
  • [Workstation diagrams]
  • [Equipment specifications]

(List only attachments actually included)

Evaluator Signature: [Name, credentials]  |  Date: [Date]

Want to use this template?

Copy it into your workflow, or book a demo to see Augustun draft notes like this automatically.