Vascular Access Evaluation and ESKD Life-Plan Note

A nephrology template for documenting the ESKD life-plan and vascular access strategy aligned with 2019 KDOQI guidelines. Structures modality sequencing, access creation/contingency/succession planning, vessel preservati…

Document Type

plan / Care Plan

Specialties

Nephrology
Created by Augustun

Template Preview

Date/Time: [Date and time of encounter]

Encounter Type: [new evaluation / follow-up / annual life-plan update / post-op follow-up / problem-focused]

Location: [Location and service setting]

Referral Source: [Referring clinician or service]

Access Summary

(Provide an at-a-glance snapshot. Document "unknown" rather than leaving blank.)

  • Current KRT status: [pre-dialysis CKD / hemodialysis / peritoneal dialysis / transplant / conservative management]
  • Current access type and site: [Access type with laterality and anatomic location]
  • Access age: [Time since creation/placement or unknown]
  • Current usability status: [fully usable / maturing / limited use / not usable / on hold / unknown]
  • Immediate risk flags: [suspected infection / suspected steal-ischemia / aneurysm skin risk / repeated dysfunction / limited remaining access sites / none] (Select all that apply.)
  • Next planned milestones: [Vessel mapping target date] | [Surgical/IR referral target date] | [Access creation target date] | [Expected cannulation readiness] | [Catheter removal goal]

Key Contacts

Primary nephrologist: [Name, contact/routing]

Vascular access interventionalist: [Name, contact/routing]

Vascular surgeon: [Name, contact/routing]

Dialysis facility and shift: [Facility name, unit contact, shift details]

Primary care clinician: [Name, contact/routing]

Transplant center: [Center, listing status, contact/routing]

Interpreter needs: [Language and modality / none]

Indication for Evaluation

[Clinical trigger for this evaluation] (State the reason: progressive CKD with recent eGFR trend; HD with access strategy change needed; PD with transition concern; failing transplant with return to dialysis anticipated; or access complication requiring re-planning. Specify whether this is an initial life-plan, annual review, or interim revision. If prior life-plan exists, state its date and whether it has changed. If unchanged, document "reviewed—no change" and reaffirm monitoring plan.)

Patient Goals and Shared Decision-Making

  • Participants: [Patient, caregivers, interpreter, team members present]
  • Patient-centered goals and priorities: [Home vs in-center preferences, schedule constraints, catheter avoidance priority, arm function preservation, hand dominance, lifestyle factors, cosmetic considerations] (Only document what was explicitly stated.)
  • KRT options discussed and outcomes: [Transplant evaluation/waitlist status; PD feasibility; home HD vs in-center HD; conservative management; outcome of each discussion] (Do not infer preferences or consent.)
  • Decision status: [Modality decision: made / pending] | [Access strategy decision: made / pending] (If pending, note reason and next steps.)
  • If goals not elicited: [Reason and when this will be revisited]

ESKD Life-Plan

(Present the planned modality sequence with aligned access strategy. If Modality 2 or 3 is undetermined, document "not determined; will reassess by [timeframe or trigger].")

Modality 1 (Primary/Next)

  • Modality and setting: [HD / PD / transplant / conservative management] — [home / in-center]
  • Anticipated timeframe or trigger: [Timeframe or clinical trigger for initiation]
  • Aligned access strategy: [Intended access type, site sequence, and bridging approach if needed; or PD catheter timing; or transplant vessel preservation plan]
  • Rationale: [Brief justification based on comorbidities, anatomy, support system, prior failures]

Modality 2 (Anticipated Next)

  • Modality and setting: [HD / PD / transplant / conservative management / not determined]
  • Anticipated timeframe or trigger: [Timeframe or trigger for transition]
  • Aligned access strategy: [Access plan for this modality]
  • Rationale: [Brief justification]

Modality 3 (Contingency)

  • Modality and setting: [HD / PD / transplant / conservative management / not determined]
  • Anticipated timeframe or trigger: [Timeframe or trigger for transition]
  • Aligned access strategy: [Access plan for this modality]
  • Rationale: [Brief justification]

Access Needs Plan

Vessel Preservation

  • Precautions: [Avoid PICC lines; avoid subclavian CVCs; minimize venipuncture in potential access arm(s)]
  • Preferred venipuncture sites: [Sites and arm considerations if draws are needed]
  • Existing devices threatening access: [Pacemaker/ICD leads; prior CVC sites; other devices]
  • Communication plan: [EHR alerts placed; team notifications; patient wallet card/bracelet]

Access Creation Plan

  • Intended access type: [AVF / AVG / endovascular AV access / tunneled CVC / PD catheter]
  • Proposed site and laterality: [Anatomic site and side with justification] (Use distal-to-proximal logic when applicable.)
  • Required pre-operative studies: [Vessel mapping ultrasound; venography if central stenosis suspected; cardiac evaluation if indicated]
  • Target dates: Mapping: [Date] | Surgical/IR visit: [Date] | Access creation: [Date] | Expected usability: [Date or criteria]
  • Bridging strategy if access not ready: [Bridge plan if needed]

Contingency Plan

  • If AVF/AVG not usable by target date: [Evaluate for correctable lesion vs proceed to alternate access vs catheter bridge]
  • If thrombosis occurs: [Urgent declot pathway and temporary dialysis access plan]
  • If infection suspected: [Culture prior to antibiotics when feasible; empiric coverage; catheter management]
  • [Other patient-specific contingencies]

Succession Plan

  • Plan A (current): [Current planned access site]
  • Plan B: [Next candidate access site and constraints]
  • Plan C: [Subsequent candidate access site and constraints]
  • What would exhaust each option: [Events or procedures that would preclude future options]

Access History

(Document all prior vascular accesses and PD catheters. If dates are unknown, document "approximate" and note plan to obtain records.)

  • [Access type] — [Laterality] — [Location]: Created [Date] | Abandoned [Date] | Reason for failure: [non-maturation / stenosis / thrombosis / infection / steal / aneurysm / patient preference] | Interventions: [Number and type] | Complications: [Details]
  • [Additional access entries as needed]
  • Catheter history: [Prior CVC sites, durations, and indicators of central venous stenosis]
  • Anticoagulation/antiplatelet context: [Agents, indications, relevance to bleeding/thrombosis risk]

Current Access Evaluation

Subjective

(Document patient and dialysis unit reports organized by complication domain.)

  • Usability: [Cannulation difficulty, pain, infiltration, hematoma]
  • Function: [Blood flow issues, pressure trends, recirculation, adequacy changes, alarms, clotting]
  • Bleeding: [Prolonged post-needle bleeding or other concerns]
  • Infection symptoms: [Fever/chills, exit-site drainage, redness, tenderness]
  • Venous hypertension/central stenosis: [Arm/face/neck swelling, collateral veins]
  • Ischemia/steal symptoms: [Coolness, numbness/tingling, pain during or between dialysis, wounds]
  • Aneurysm concerns: [Rapid enlargement, skin thinning, ulceration]
  • Heart failure symptoms: [Dyspnea, edema, orthopnea if access-related concern]

Objective Exam

(Use systematic "look, listen, feel" approach.)

  • Inspection: [Erythema, edema, drainage, skin integrity, aneurysm characteristics]
  • Palpation: [Thrill quality—continuous vs systolic-only; pulse character; tenderness]
  • Auscultation: [Bruit character and changes along the circuit]
  • Distal perfusion: [Pulses, capillary refill, temperature, sensorimotor findings]
  • Limb edema and collaterals: [Presence and extent]
  • CVC evaluation: [Exit site, tunnel, cuff position, dressing condition] (If applicable.)

Objective Data

  • Dialysis session data: [Recent Qb trends, pressures, delivered dose, alarms, clotting] (Only include available data.)
  • Imaging: [Ultrasound mapping with vessel diameters/depth; duplex or fistulogram findings; central venous evaluation] (If not performed, state "not performed" with reason.)
  • Infection workup: [Blood cultures, exit-site cultures, relevant labs]
  • Contrast considerations: [Risk/benefit and mitigation if residual kidney function present]

Assessment

(Provide a severity-ordered, problem-oriented synthesis. Use "suspected" vs "confirmed" language appropriately. Do not label problems as confirmed without diagnostic basis.)

[Problem 1 with suspected/confirmed status]

[Brief synthesis linking subjective and objective data to impression]

[Problem 2 with suspected/confirmed status]

[Brief synthesis] (Include additional problems as applicable.)

Plan

Timeline

  • [Task] — [Target date] — [Responsible party]
  • [Referrals placed: recipient, urgency, clinical question]
  • [Studies ordered with timing]
  • [Access creation target] | [Expected readiness] | [Catheter removal goal]
  • [Follow-up appointment and pre-visit requirements]

Problem-Based Actions

  • KRT trajectory and modality planning: [Transplant referral status; home dialysis training plan or reason not candidate]
  • Suspected stenosis: [Clinical indicators; imaging plan and timeline]
  • Thrombosis: [Declot pathway; dialysis bridge; post-procedure surveillance]
  • Aneurysm: [Urgency based on skin risk; cannulation avoidance; referral if indicated]
  • Steal/ischemia: [Severity; safety instructions; referral urgency]
  • Suspected CVC infection: [Culture timing; empiric coverage; catheter management]
  • CVC dysfunction: [Definition applied; troubleshooting; escalation pathway]
  • Other problems: [Actions aligned to assessment]

Dialysis Unit Communication

  • Cannulation status: [ready / maturing / do not cannulate]
  • Cannulation method: [Rope-ladder / buttonhole / area rotation / ultrasound-guided]
  • Do not cannulate segments: [Segment(s) to avoid and reason]
  • Catheter care reminders: [Dressing protocol, locking solution, aseptic technique]

Medications

  • Anticoagulant/antiplatelet peri-procedural plan: [Hold/continue instructions and responsible prescriber]
  • Antibiotics: [Agent, route, duration; avoid vessel-damaging lines]
  • Relevant allergies: [Antiseptics, contrast, antibiotics]

Patient Education

  • Daily access self-check: [Look, listen, feel; what to report urgently]
  • Catheter care behaviors: [Showering precautions, securement, infection prevention] (If applicable.)
  • Emergency steps for aneurysm rupture: [Direct pressure; call emergency services]
  • Vessel preservation behaviors: [Avoid BP cuffs/venipuncture on access arm]
  • Materials provided: [Written materials; teach-back completed]

Follow-Up and Monitoring

  • Life-plan review interval: [Annual minimum / sooner if changes]
  • Access review interval: [Timing and modality]
  • Return precautions: [Infection signs, worsening ischemia, new swelling, inability to dialyze, bleeding]

Acknowledgment

[Patient participation statement] (Document whether patient provided input, understands the plan, and agrees; or document if patient declined, was unavailable, or lacked capacity. State whether this is an initial plan, annual update, or revised plan.)

Want to use this template?

Copy it into your workflow, or book a demo to see Augustun draft notes like this automatically.