Multidisciplinary Tumor Board Note
A template for documenting multidisciplinary tumor board case discussions and consensus recommendations. Aligned with Commission on Cancer accreditation requirements, it captures staging, guideline-based options, clinica…
Document Type
clinical note / Consultation Note
Specialties
Template Preview
Multidisciplinary Tumor Board Note
Conference Date and Time: [Date and time]
Conference Type: [disease-site tumor board / molecular tumor board / general / other]
Location/Modality: [in-person / virtual / hybrid]
Patient Name: [Patient full name]
MRN: [MRN]
DOB: [DOB]
Presenting Clinician: [Name, credentials, service]
Moderator/Chair: [Name, credentials]
Documenter: [Name, credentials] (Include only if different from author)
Disciplines Present
(List attendees grouped by discipline with credentials. Document "Not present" for absent core disciplines rather than omitting.)
- Surgery: [Attendees with credentials / Not present]
- Medical Oncology: [Attendees with credentials / Not present]
- Radiation Oncology: [Attendees with credentials / Not present]
- Radiology: [Attendees with credentials / Not present]
- Pathology: [Attendees with credentials / Not present]
(Include additional disciplines only when present: genetics/genetic counseling, interventional radiology, palliative care, nursing/navigation, clinical trials/research, other.)
Consent and Disclaimer
Consent status: [patient consented / consent not required per policy / consent status unknown with follow-up planned]
Tumor board review is consultative; recommendations are advisory. Final management decisions should be made by the treating clinician in shared decision-making with the patient, incorporating patient preferences, comorbidities, and evolving clinical information.
Reason for Presentation
Category: [new diagnosis / post-operative planning / recurrence or progression / pathology clarification / imaging clarification / molecular interpretation / clinical trial eligibility / second opinion / other]
Clinical question(s): [Specific question(s) posed to the board]
Case Summary
Diagnosis: [Primary site, histology, key biomarkers, date of diagnosis]
Clinical course: [Concise timeline of prior surgeries, systemic therapy lines, radiation, and recurrences/progression]
Current status: [Performance status with scale, symptoms affecting function, major comorbidities impacting treatment feasibility]
Key labs: [Lab name, value, and date] (Include only if materially affects treatment options; otherwise omit this line)
Diagnostic Review
(Summarize only decision-relevant findings discussed at tumor board; do not copy full reports. Omit subsections that were not reviewed.)
Imaging Reviewed
- [Modality, body region, date] — [Key findings relevant to tumor extent, nodal status, metastatic disease, response assessment, or resectability]
(If studies are pending or unavailable, specify which and note that recommendations are contingent on results.)
Pathology Reviewed
- Specimen: [Specimen type, site, collection date]
- Findings: [Histology, grade, key staging elements including margins, nodes, depth/size, lymphovascular/perineural invasion as applicable]
- Biomarkers/Special studies: [Markers, results, method, date]
(If pathology is pending or unavailable, specify and note contingency.)
Molecular/Genetics Reviewed
(Include only if molecular or genomic testing was discussed at tumor board.)
- Test: [Test type, laboratory, specimen date]
- Key alterations: [Gene/alteration — pathogenic / likely pathogenic / VUS / benign]
- Actionability: [Therapeutic relevance, trial eligibility, resistance markers]
- Germline considerations: [Indications for germline testing or counseling, if discussed]
(If results are pending, note that recommendations are contingent.)
Staging
Staging system: [System and version, e.g., AJCC 8th edition]
Clinical stage: [cT, cN, cM; Stage group] — Basis: [imaging only / pathology confirmed / mixed]
Pathologic stage: [pT, pN, pM; Stage group] (Include only if surgical pathology available)
Stage status: [Complete / Pending — specify missing inputs required] (Do not infer a stage if key elements are missing; document what is needed to complete staging.)
Guideline-Based Options Reviewed
Guidelines referenced: [Name and version/date]
- Surgery: [Standard-of-care options relevant to patient's stage and fitness; key eligibility considerations]
- Radiation: [Standard-of-care options, intent, key eligibility or contraindications]
- Systemic therapy: [Intent, regimen class, molecular prerequisites, organ function and performance status requirements, prior therapy and resistance considerations]
- Clinical trials: [Yes, trials considered / No, not discussed / Not applicable — with rationale]
- Genetic counseling/testing: [Discussed and recommendation / Not indicated — with rationale]
- Supportive care: [Services discussed: palliative care, pain, nutrition, rehabilitation, psychosocial support, fertility preservation, smoking cessation]
(If no guideline-based deliberation occurred, document the reason.)
Discussion Summary
(Include for complex cases or when there was significant deliberation or disagreement. Summarize decision logic, trade-offs discussed, and resolution of disagreements. If material dissent exists, document majority view and minority view with core reasoning. Omit this section for straightforward cases.)
[Discussion summary]
Consensus Recommendations
Overall Recommendation: [1–2 sentence summary of recommended management strategy]
Plan
- Additional Diagnostic Workup: [Action/test; condition/trigger if contingent; responsible service; timeframe]
- Local Therapy: [Surgery and/or radiation intent, modality, sequencing; responsible service; timeframe]
- Systemic Therapy: [Intent, regimen class, timing; responsible service; timeframe]
- Clinical Trials: [Screening or referral action, trial name if specified; responsible service; timeframe]
- Genetics: [Referral or testing recommendation; responsible service; timeframe]
- Supportive Care: [Symptom management or specialty referral; responsible service; timeframe]
(Include only applicable plan domains. Document if/then contingencies for pending results. If consensus was not reached, document majority recommendation, minority recommendation with reasoning, and plan for resolution.)
Communication and Follow-Up
- Patient communication: [Who will communicate recommendations to patient and when]
- Referring clinician/PCP: [Who will communicate and timeframe]
- Implementation: [Service/clinician responsible for placing orders and coordinating care]
- Re-presentation: [Timing and conditions for re-presentation at tumor board] (Include only if applicable)
Signature
Author: [Name, credentials]
Date/Time: [Timestamp]
Want to use this template?
Copy it into your workflow, or book a demo to see Augustun draft notes like this automatically.