Functional Medicine Lab Review Report

A structured template for documenting interpretation of conventional and specialty laboratory results in functional medicine practice. Emphasizes separation of objective data from clinical interpretation, explicit uncert…

Document Type

interpretation / results report / Study Interpretation Report

Specialties

Functional Medicine
Created by Augustun

Template Preview

Document Type: Functional Medicine Lab Review Report

Patient: [Patient name], [DOB], [MRN]

Author: [Clinician name], [Credentials]

Date Authored: [Date and time]

Encounter: [Date of service / Asynchronous chart review performed on date]

Labs Reviewed From: [Source(s): EHR / outside PDFs / patient-provided results / specialty lab portal]

Note: This report interprets results; it does not replace the original laboratory report.

Reason for Report

[Clinical indication and question(s) being addressed] (If indication is unknown, state: "Reason for testing not provided in available records.")

  • [Primary clinical concern or goal]
  • [Secondary concern or relevant comorbidity] (Include only if applicable)
  • [Panels/tests reviewed with collection dates and specimen types]

Clinical Context

(Include only details that influence interpretation. If unavailable, state: "Clinical context unavailable; interpretation is limited accordingly.")

  • Active diagnoses relevant to labs: [Pertinent diagnoses or conditions]
  • Pertinent symptoms: [Key symptoms with timing and trajectory]
  • Current medications and supplements: [Items affecting lab interpretation: hormones, high-dose vitamins, binders, antibiotics, steroids, anticoagulants, etc.]
  • Pre-analytic conditions: [Fasting status, time of draw, cycle day for hormone testing, specimen handling notes]

Results

(Enter verified values from reports. Use lab-provided units and reference intervals exactly as provided. Note pending or unavailable results explicitly.)

Conventional Labs

(Group by panel or physiologic domain: cardiometabolic, thyroid, hematology/iron, renal, hepatic, inflammation.)

Analyte Result Units Reference Interval Flag Collection Date Performing Lab
[Test name] [Value] [Units] [Reference range] [H / L / Critical / —] [Date] [Lab name]

Specialty Labs

(Stool markers, urinary metabolites, micronutrient panels, hormone panels, genomics. Preserve lab-specific reference intervals.)

Marker Result Units Reference Interval Flag Collection Date Performing Lab
[Marker name] [Value] [Units] [Reference range] [H / L / Critical / —] [Date] [Lab name]

Trends

(Include when ≥2 timepoints available for clinically relevant markers. Otherwise omit this subsection.)

Analyte/Marker Prior Result (Date) Current Result (Date) Units Δ from Prior % Change
[Test name] [Value] ([Date]) [Value] ([Date]) [Units] [Absolute delta] [Percent change]

Data Quality Notes: [Specimen or processing issues, missing reference ranges, tests with no results: "Result pending / not available"] (Omit if no issues)

Key Findings

  • Critical or time-sensitive findings: [Critical values and action taken or escalation plan] (Include only if present)
  • [Most clinically significant abnormality with context]
  • [Additional significant abnormality with trend or magnitude]
  • [Notable pattern or discordance affecting risk assessment]
  • [Key relevant negatives that alter management] (Include only when they change clinical decision-making)

Interpretation and Assessment

(Organize by clinical problem, highest risk first. Distinguish between established diagnoses, risk states, and hypotheses. For specialty markers with proprietary reference intervals, note: "Interpretation relies on lab-provided reference intervals; clinical utility may vary.")

[Problem title reflecting dominant pattern or condition]

What is abnormal: [Markers abnormal and degree of deviation]

Clinical significance: [Why it matters; associated risks or outcomes]

Differential considerations: [Physiologic/benign causes, medication/supplement effects, pre-analytic artifacts, pathologic causes]

Additional information needed: [Confirmatory data or context to discriminate between possibilities]

[Next problem title]

(Repeat structure for each additional problem)

What is abnormal: [Details]

Clinical significance: [Details]

Differential considerations: [Details]

Additional information needed: [Details]

Recommendations and Plan

(Organize by problem. Provide actionable steps with specific timelines, doses, and durations.)

[Problem title]

  • Diagnostic next steps: [Confirmatory labs, imaging, questionnaires, trials off interfering agents with timing of re-test]
  • Therapeutic recommendations: [Lifestyle interventions with specifics; supplements with dose, duration, monitoring, contraindications; medications if within scope]
  • Referrals: [PCP / specialist / dietitian with rationale] (Include only if indicated)

[Next problem title]

(Repeat structure for each problem)

  • Diagnostic next steps: [Details]
  • Therapeutic recommendations: [Details]
  • Referrals: [Details]

Monitoring Plan

(Define who will order, track, and communicate results. Include targets and triggers for earlier action.)

Problem/Marker What to Monitor Timing Target/Goal Triggers for Earlier Action Responsible Party Follow-up Modality
[Problem or marker] [Specific labs and/or symptom metrics] [Interval] [Evidence-based target] [Symptoms or thresholds prompting earlier contact] [Clinician/team member] [In-person / video / portal / phone]

Urgent guidance: [Specific symptoms requiring immediate clinic contact or emergency care] (Include only if applicable)

Critical Results Communication

(Include only if critical or urgent results are present. Otherwise omit entire section.)

  • Date/time result became known: [Date and time]
  • Person notified: [Name and role]
  • Method of notification: [Phone / portal / in-person]
  • Confirmation received: [Yes / No with details]
  • Action taken: [Immediate management steps]

Limitations

(Document material limitations affecting interpretation. Omit section if none.)

  • [Missing data and impact on interpretation]
  • [Patient-reported information not independently verified]
  • [Assumptions made and effect on certainty]
  • [Discordance between specialty and conventional markers requiring confirmatory testing]

Want to use this template?

Copy it into your workflow, or book a demo to see Augustun draft notes like this automatically.