Functional Medicine Lab Review Report
A structured template for documenting interpretation of conventional and specialty laboratory results in functional medicine practice. Emphasizes separation of objective data from clinical interpretation, explicit uncert…
Document Type
interpretation / results report / Study Interpretation Report
Specialties
Template Preview
Document Type: Functional Medicine Lab Review Report
Patient: [Patient name], [DOB], [MRN]
Author: [Clinician name], [Credentials]
Date Authored: [Date and time]
Encounter: [Date of service / Asynchronous chart review performed on date]
Labs Reviewed From: [Source(s): EHR / outside PDFs / patient-provided results / specialty lab portal]
Note: This report interprets results; it does not replace the original laboratory report.
Reason for Report
[Clinical indication and question(s) being addressed] (If indication is unknown, state: "Reason for testing not provided in available records.")
- [Primary clinical concern or goal]
- [Secondary concern or relevant comorbidity] (Include only if applicable)
- [Panels/tests reviewed with collection dates and specimen types]
Clinical Context
(Include only details that influence interpretation. If unavailable, state: "Clinical context unavailable; interpretation is limited accordingly.")
- Active diagnoses relevant to labs: [Pertinent diagnoses or conditions]
- Pertinent symptoms: [Key symptoms with timing and trajectory]
- Current medications and supplements: [Items affecting lab interpretation: hormones, high-dose vitamins, binders, antibiotics, steroids, anticoagulants, etc.]
- Pre-analytic conditions: [Fasting status, time of draw, cycle day for hormone testing, specimen handling notes]
Results
(Enter verified values from reports. Use lab-provided units and reference intervals exactly as provided. Note pending or unavailable results explicitly.)
Conventional Labs
(Group by panel or physiologic domain: cardiometabolic, thyroid, hematology/iron, renal, hepatic, inflammation.)
| Analyte | Result | Units | Reference Interval | Flag | Collection Date | Performing Lab |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| [Test name] | [Value] | [Units] | [Reference range] | [H / L / Critical / —] | [Date] | [Lab name] |
Specialty Labs
(Stool markers, urinary metabolites, micronutrient panels, hormone panels, genomics. Preserve lab-specific reference intervals.)
| Marker | Result | Units | Reference Interval | Flag | Collection Date | Performing Lab |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| [Marker name] | [Value] | [Units] | [Reference range] | [H / L / Critical / —] | [Date] | [Lab name] |
Trends
(Include when ≥2 timepoints available for clinically relevant markers. Otherwise omit this subsection.)
| Analyte/Marker | Prior Result (Date) | Current Result (Date) | Units | Δ from Prior | % Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| [Test name] | [Value] ([Date]) | [Value] ([Date]) | [Units] | [Absolute delta] | [Percent change] |
Data Quality Notes: [Specimen or processing issues, missing reference ranges, tests with no results: "Result pending / not available"] (Omit if no issues)
Key Findings
- Critical or time-sensitive findings: [Critical values and action taken or escalation plan] (Include only if present)
- [Most clinically significant abnormality with context]
- [Additional significant abnormality with trend or magnitude]
- [Notable pattern or discordance affecting risk assessment]
- [Key relevant negatives that alter management] (Include only when they change clinical decision-making)
Interpretation and Assessment
(Organize by clinical problem, highest risk first. Distinguish between established diagnoses, risk states, and hypotheses. For specialty markers with proprietary reference intervals, note: "Interpretation relies on lab-provided reference intervals; clinical utility may vary.")
[Problem title reflecting dominant pattern or condition]
What is abnormal: [Markers abnormal and degree of deviation]
Clinical significance: [Why it matters; associated risks or outcomes]
Differential considerations: [Physiologic/benign causes, medication/supplement effects, pre-analytic artifacts, pathologic causes]
Additional information needed: [Confirmatory data or context to discriminate between possibilities]
[Next problem title]
(Repeat structure for each additional problem)
What is abnormal: [Details]
Clinical significance: [Details]
Differential considerations: [Details]
Additional information needed: [Details]
Recommendations and Plan
(Organize by problem. Provide actionable steps with specific timelines, doses, and durations.)
[Problem title]
- Diagnostic next steps: [Confirmatory labs, imaging, questionnaires, trials off interfering agents with timing of re-test]
- Therapeutic recommendations: [Lifestyle interventions with specifics; supplements with dose, duration, monitoring, contraindications; medications if within scope]
- Referrals: [PCP / specialist / dietitian with rationale] (Include only if indicated)
[Next problem title]
(Repeat structure for each problem)
- Diagnostic next steps: [Details]
- Therapeutic recommendations: [Details]
- Referrals: [Details]
Monitoring Plan
(Define who will order, track, and communicate results. Include targets and triggers for earlier action.)
| Problem/Marker | What to Monitor | Timing | Target/Goal | Triggers for Earlier Action | Responsible Party | Follow-up Modality |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| [Problem or marker] | [Specific labs and/or symptom metrics] | [Interval] | [Evidence-based target] | [Symptoms or thresholds prompting earlier contact] | [Clinician/team member] | [In-person / video / portal / phone] |
Urgent guidance: [Specific symptoms requiring immediate clinic contact or emergency care] (Include only if applicable)
Critical Results Communication
(Include only if critical or urgent results are present. Otherwise omit entire section.)
- Date/time result became known: [Date and time]
- Person notified: [Name and role]
- Method of notification: [Phone / portal / in-person]
- Confirmation received: [Yes / No with details]
- Action taken: [Immediate management steps]
Limitations
(Document material limitations affecting interpretation. Omit section if none.)
- [Missing data and impact on interpretation]
- [Patient-reported information not independently verified]
- [Assumptions made and effect on certainty]
- [Discordance between specialty and conventional markers requiring confirmatory testing]
Want to use this template?
Copy it into your workflow, or book a demo to see Augustun draft notes like this automatically.
Related templates
interpretation / results report
504 Accommodation Evaluation Summary
interpretation / results report
ABPM Interpretation Report (Pediatrics)
interpretation / results report
Actigraphy Interpretation Report
interpretation / results report
Ambulatory ECG Monitor Interpretation Report (Holter/Event/Patch)
interpretation / results report
Anorectal Manometry Interpretation Report
interpretation / results report
Assistive Technology Assessment Report