Bone Marrow Biopsy Results Review Note
A hematology/oncology note template for reviewing and communicating bone marrow biopsy results. Structured to integrate pathology findings with clinical context, document risk stratification, and capture the results disc…
Document Type
clinical note / Progress Note
Specialties
Template Preview
Date/Time of Encounter: [Date and time]
Patient: [Patient full name]
Provider: [Provider name, credentials]
Encounter Type: [in-person / video / telephone]
Specimen Date and Site: [Collection date; anatomic site]
Accession/Case Number: [Accession/case number] (If outside pathology and accession unavailable, state: "Outside report pending; diagnosis to be confirmed.")
Outside Pathology/Referring Institution: [Referring institution] (Include only if outside pathology was reviewed.)
Chief Concern
[Patient-facing reason for visit] (State as: Review bone marrow biopsy results performed for [indication]; discuss diagnosis and next steps.)
Interval History
[Concise narrative impacting interpretation and urgency] (Include: indication for biopsy and key pre-biopsy findings; post-procedure course if relevant; current symptoms influencing urgency or therapy selection; pertinent therapy context including prior treatments, transfusions, or growth factors. Omit unrelated historical details. If post-procedure symptoms were not assessed, state explicitly.)
Objective
Vitals/Performance Status: [Vitals; ECOG performance status] (Include ECOG if malignancy diagnosed or suspected. For telephone/video visits, state "No vitals obtained.")
Exam: [Focused exam findings] (Include only if performed: general appearance, skin findings, lymphadenopathy, hepatosplenomegaly, neurologic findings if hyperviscosity concern. If not examined, state "Exam deferred.")
Labs Reviewed: [CBC with differential, chemistries, disease-specific markers as relevant, with dates] (Label results as new vs baseline. For missing labs, distinguish "not resulted" from "not ordered.")
Bone Marrow Pathology Findings
[Final diagnosis / Working diagnosis]: [Concise diagnosis statement] (State if definitive, provisional pending ancillary studies, or indeterminate.)
- Specimen adequacy: [Aspirate/core quality; limitations] (Note hemodilution, dry tap, or crush artifact; describe interpretive impact.)
- Cellularity: [Estimated cellularity (%) and age-adjusted context]
- Blasts: [Blast percentage and method] (Specify source: aspirate differential, flow cytometry, and/or IHC.)
- Dysplasia: [Lineages involved and degree] (Include only if present.)
- Fibrosis: [Fibrosis grade] (Include only if present or clinically relevant.)
- Immunophenotype: [Key flow cytometry/IHC findings] (Highlight aberrant or diagnostic patterns.)
- Cytogenetics/FISH: [Key abnormalities or normal karyotype]
- Molecular/NGS: [Pathogenic variants with clinical significance] (Note diagnostic, prognostic, or targetable relevance; label VUS separately.)
- Pending studies: [List pending tests and expected turnaround] (Include only if studies are pending.)
(Summarize clinically actionable elements; do not reproduce entire pathology report.)
Assessment
[Primary hematologic diagnosis or differential]
[Status statement with key supporting evidence and clinical implications] (State whether diagnosis is definitive, provisional, or indeterminate; integrate marrow findings with peripheral blood and clinical context.)
- Risk stratification: [Model used, key inputs, risk category] (Use disease-appropriate model: ELN for AML, IPSS-R/IPSS-M for MDS, R-ISS for myeloma, DIPSS for myelofibrosis. If incomplete, specify missing inputs.)
[Additional problems as applicable]
[Brief status, evidence, and implications for each]
Plan
- Immediate safety actions: [Admission, urgent therapy, transfusion as indicated]
- Additional workup: [Pending studies, repeat marrow, germline testing, staging imaging as needed]
- Treatment plan: [Regimen, intent, rationale, clinical trial consideration] (Include pre-treatment requirements if initiating therapy.)
- Supportive care: [Transfusion thresholds, infection prophylaxis, tumor lysis precautions as relevant]
- Referrals: [Transplant evaluation, tumor board, specialty consultations]
- Follow-up: [Timing, modality, plan for communicating pending results]
- Patient communication: [How results were communicated; who was present; discussion of diagnosis, prognosis, and options; patient understanding and preferences]
- Contingency planning: [If/then actions based on pending results] (Example: If cytogenetics show high-risk features → [action]; if favorable → [action].)
- Urgent notifications: [Who notified, when, actions taken] (Include only if critical results required urgent notification.)
Want to use this template?
Copy it into your workflow, or book a demo to see Augustun draft notes like this automatically.