Back to blog
13 min read

Pediatric OT Documentation: SOAP Notes, Templates & Examples

Dr. Medeline Yost

Dr. Medeline Yost

Chief Medical Officer, Augustun

Published July 4, 2026

Updated July 4, 2026

On this page

Writing notes for pediatric occupational therapy is not the same as writing notes for adults. When you work with children, you involve parents and caregivers in every session. You track progress against developmental milestones instead of prior functional levels. You use play-based interventions that might look very different from adult treatment activities. And you must show how therapy connects to functional goals — things like holding a crayon, putting on a coat, or sitting still during circle time.

This guide gives you templates and full SOAP note examples for the most common pediatric presentations: fine motor delay, sensory processing disorder (SPD), autism spectrum disorder (ASD), and developmental coordination disorder (DCD). If you are new to OT documentation or just want better examples to follow, start with our general OT documentation guide. For more SOAP note samples across settings, see OT SOAP note examples.

Whether you work in a clinic, a school, or an early intervention program, the goal is the same. Write notes that are clear, show skilled care, and prove the child is making progress toward meaningful goals.

What Makes Pediatric OT Documentation Different?

Pediatric OT notes share the same SOAP structure as adult notes, but the content inside each section changes. Here are the key differences you will notice.

  • Subjective includes caregiver reports. Young children cannot tell you how they feel. Instead, you document what a parent, teacher, or aide says about the child's performance at home or school.
  • Objective needs developmental context. Rather than comparing to a prior level of function, you compare to age-expected milestones. A 4-year-old who cannot copy a cross is behind; a 2-year-old who cannot is on track.
  • Interventions are play-based. Stringing beads, rolling Play-Doh, and climbing obstacle courses are skilled OT — but only if your note explains the therapeutic purpose behind the activity.
  • IEP and IFSP goals drive the plan. In school-based and early intervention settings, your documentation must tie directly to Individualized Education Program (IEP) or Individualized Family Service Plan (IFSP) goals.
  • Different standardized tools. You will reference pediatric-specific assessments like the BOT-2, PDMS-2, Beery VMI, and Sensory Profile-2 rather than adult measures.

Keep these differences in mind as you read through the examples below. Every note should show that you are providing skilled occupational therapy, not just playing with the child.

Quick rule of thumb

If a reviewer could read your note and think "that sounds like babysitting," you need more clinical language. Name the skill component (e.g., "intrinsic hand strengthening via resistive pinch"), state why it matters ("to support a functional tripod grasp for pre-writing"), and measure something ("completed 7/10 trials with verbal cues").

Common Standardized Assessment Tools in Pediatric OT

Referencing a standardized tool adds credibility and objectivity to your notes. Include the tool name, the score or percentile, and the date it was administered. You do not need to re-administer every session — cite the most recent score and note whether current performance is consistent with that result.

Below are the six tools you will encounter most often in pediatric OT. Choose the one that matches the child's primary area of concern and age.

ToolAbbreviationWhat It MeasuresAge Range
Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor ProficiencyBOT-2Fine and gross motor skills, bilateral coordination, balance, speed4–21 years
Peabody Developmental Motor ScalesPDMS-2Gross and fine motor developmentBirth–5 years
Beery Visual-Motor IntegrationVMIEye-hand coordination, visual perception, motor coordination2–100 years
Sensory Profile-2SP-2Sensory processing patterns across sensory systemsBirth–14 years
School Function AssessmentSFAStudent participation, task supports, activity performance in schoolK–6th grade
Pediatric Evaluation of Disability InventoryPEDISelf-care, mobility, social function in children with disabilities6 months–7.5 years

Pediatric OT SOAP Note Template

Use this template as a starting point. Fill in the brackets with details from your session. The key is to include developmental context, caregiver input, and a clear link between the activity and the functional goal.

Pediatric OT SOAP Note — General Template

Subjective
[Caregiver/teacher] reports [child's name] has been [describe performance at home/school since last session]. [Quote caregiver if helpful, e.g., 'She still needs help with buttons every morning.']. Child [arrived happy/crying/eager to play]. [Note any changes in medication, sleep, diet, or routine].
Objective
[Child] participated in [duration]-minute OT session targeting [goal area — e.g., fine motor skills, sensory regulation, self-care]. Activities included [list 2–3 activities with therapeutic purpose]. [Grasp pattern / posture / motor observations]. [Standardized test score or milestone comparison if applicable]. Assist level: [independent / verbal cues / visual cues / hand-over-hand]. [Quantifiable data — e.g., completed 8/10 bead strings, maintained seated posture for 4 minutes].
Assessment
[Child] demonstrates [improvement/plateau/regression] in [goal area] compared to [baseline/last session]. [Strengths observed]. [Barriers to progress — e.g., low frustration tolerance, tactile defensiveness]. Current performance is [below/at/above] age-expected level for [skill]. Continued skilled OT is indicated to address [specific deficit].
Plan
Continue OT [frequency, e.g., 2x/week for 30 min] targeting [goal]. Next session: [specific focus or activity progression]. Home program: [activity for caregiver to practice — e.g., daily Play-Doh play for 10 min]. [Update IEP/IFSP team if applicable]. Re-assess with [tool] in [timeframe].

4 Pediatric OT SOAP Note Examples

Below are four complete examples for the most common pediatric presentations you will encounter: fine motor delay, sensory processing disorder, autism spectrum disorder, and developmental coordination disorder. Each note uses realistic clinical details so you can see how the template works in practice.

Pay attention to how each example includes caregiver input in the Subjective, measurable data in the Objective, developmental context in the Assessment, and a specific plan that includes a home program. These are the four elements reviewers and payers look for in every pediatric OT note.

Example 1: Fine Motor Delay

Fine Motor Delay — 4-Year-Old Male

Subjective
Mother reports Liam (DOB 03/12/2022) continues to have difficulty holding crayons and using utensils at home. She states, "He still uses his whole fist to color and gets frustrated when his sister draws letters." Mom also notes he has trouble pulling up his pants after toileting. No changes in sleep, diet, or medications since last visit.
Objective
Liam participated in a 30-minute OT session targeting pre-writing skills and hand strengthening. Activities included Play-Doh squeeze and roll (intrinsic hand strengthening), bead stringing with 1/2-inch beads (pincer grasp, bilateral coordination), and vertical line imitation on an easel (pre-writing, shoulder stability). Liam demonstrated a static quadrupod grasp on a standard crayon, transitioning from a palmar-supinate grasp observed at evaluation. He copied a vertical line with 1 verbal cue but could not imitate a horizontal line. He strung 6/10 beads in 3 minutes with moderate verbal cueing. Beery VMI standard score at initial eval: 78 (below average). Seated posture: forward trunk lean with bilateral forearm support on table.
Assessment
Liam shows improvement in grasp pattern (palmar-supinate → static quadrupod) since initial evaluation 6 weeks ago. Pre-writing skills remain below age expectations — a typically developing 4-year-old copies a cross and begins to copy simple letters. Hand strength and endurance continue to limit functional performance in self-care and school readiness tasks. Skilled OT remains necessary to progress grasp development, improve hand strength, and build pre-writing skills.
Plan
Continue OT 2x/week for 30 minutes. Next session: introduce cross imitation on vertical surface and begin scissors skills (snipping). Home program: 10 minutes of Play-Doh play daily, practice drawing lines on easel or whiteboard. Discuss progress with preschool teacher to coordinate classroom supports. Re-assess Beery VMI in 8 weeks.

Example 2: Sensory Processing Disorder (SPD)

Sensory Processing Disorder — 6-Year-Old Female

Subjective
Mother and classroom teacher both report ongoing sensory-related challenges. Mom states, "She screams when I try to wash her hair and refuses to touch anything sticky." Teacher reports Maya covers her ears during music class and avoids glue activities in art. Mom notes Maya has been sleeping better since starting the bedtime brushing protocol last week. No medication changes.
Objective
Maya participated in a 45-minute OT session targeting sensory modulation and graded exposure to tactile and auditory input. Activities included therapressure brushing protocol (Wilbarger) followed by joint compressions, graded tactile bin (dry rice → damp sand → shaving cream) with choice-making, and headphone-based listening activity at gradually increasing volume (3 songs, volume raised from 30% to 50%). Maya tolerated dry rice and damp sand for 2 minutes each without withdrawal. She touched shaving cream with one finger for 10 seconds before requesting to stop — an improvement from last session where she refused entirely. She tolerated headphone volume at 50% for 1 song before removing headphones. Sensory Profile-2 at evaluation: Definite Difference in tactile sensitivity and auditory sensitivity quadrants. Maya transitioned between all 3 activities with 1 verbal cue and a visual timer.
Assessment
Maya demonstrates gradual improvement in tactile tolerance, moving from complete avoidance of wet textures to brief, voluntary contact with shaving cream. Auditory tolerance is also improving — she tolerated moderate headphone volume for one full song. Her sensory over-responsivity continues to limit classroom participation (avoidance of art activities, covering ears in group settings). The therapressure brushing protocol and graded exposure approach are producing measurable gains. Continued skilled OT is warranted to expand tolerance and develop self-regulation strategies Maya can use independently.
Plan
Continue OT 2x/week for 45 minutes. Next session: progress tactile exposure to finger painting with a single color; continue auditory grading. Update sensory diet handout for teacher with 3 classroom strategies (fidget tool, noise-reducing earmuffs during assemblies, seat cushion). Home program: continue Wilbarger brushing protocol 2x/day, offer one messy play opportunity daily. Collaborate with teacher at next IEP check-in (scheduled 08/15).

Example 3: Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD)

Autism Spectrum Disorder — 5-Year-Old Male

Subjective
Father reports Ethan (DOB 09/04/2021) had a "rough weekend" with multiple meltdowns during dressing and tooth brushing. Dad states, "He threw his toothbrush across the room both mornings." Ethan's ABA therapist shared that he is following a 3-step visual schedule for hand washing at the clinic with only gestural prompts. No changes in medication (risperidone 0.5 mg at bedtime). Ethan arrived at the session calm, immediately went to the visual schedule board.
Objective
Ethan participated in a 30-minute OT session targeting self-care (tooth brushing, dressing) and transition tolerance. Activities included tooth brushing sequence using a 5-step visual strip (wet brush → paste → brush top → brush bottom → spit and rinse), shirt donning practice with backward chaining, and transition practice between 3 stations using a visual timer and "first-then" board. Tooth brushing: Ethan completed steps 1–3 with visual cues only, required hand-over-hand assist for step 4 (brushing bottom teeth — tactile sensitivity on lower gums), and completed step 5 independently. Dressing: Ethan pulled shirt down from head-through position independently (step 5 of backward chain); required moderate physical assist for arm insertion (steps 2–3). Transitions: Ethan transitioned between all 3 stations with 1 verbal prompt and visual timer; no maladaptive behavior. Total session: 0 episodes of crying, hitting, or elopement.
Assessment
Ethan demonstrates steady progress in self-care routines when visual supports are in place. Tooth brushing has improved from requiring full hand-over-hand assistance to completing 4 of 5 steps with visual cues or independently. Dressing progress is emerging — he is at step 5 of the backward chain for shirt donning, consistent with a 1-step-per-week progression. Transition tolerance is a strength when visual timer and first-then board are used. Self-regulation breakdown at home appears linked to absence of visual supports during routines. Continued skilled OT is needed to advance backward chaining, reduce prompting levels, and train caregivers on visual support use at home.
Plan
Continue OT 3x/week for 30 minutes. Next session: progress backward chain to step 4 (one arm in shirt), begin sock donning sequence. Create a laminated tooth brushing visual strip for home use — send with dad at end of next session. Coordinate with ABA therapist to align visual schedule format across settings. Home program: practice tooth brushing with visual strip 2x/day, use first-then board before all transitions. Review IEP self-care goals at annual meeting (scheduled 09/20).

Example 4: Developmental Coordination Disorder (DCD)

Developmental Coordination Disorder — 8-Year-Old Female

Subjective
Mother reports Sophia (DOB 11/22/2017) continues to struggle with handwriting and buttoning her school uniform. Mom states, "Her teacher says she is the slowest writer in the class and her letters are hard to read." Sophia told therapist, "I hate writing. My hand gets tired." Mom also notes Sophia avoids ball games at recess and was picked last for teams. No medication changes. Sophia arrived in good spirits.
Objective
Sophia participated in a 45-minute OT session targeting handwriting, bilateral coordination, and fastener skills. Activities included handwriting warm-up (letter sizing on highlighted paper — tall, small, and tail letters), bilateral ball toss (catching a 6-inch playground ball from 5 feet), and buttoning practice on a dressing frame (5 buttons, medium size). Handwriting: Sophia wrote a 6-word sentence in 2 minutes 10 seconds; 4/6 words were legible with correct letter sizing. Letter reversals noted for "b" and "d." She used appropriate pencil pressure with a pencil grip. Ball toss: caught 4/10 tosses (2-hand catch); missed catches were due to delayed hand closure and poor anticipatory reach. Buttoning: completed 3/5 buttons independently in 4 minutes; required verbal cues for button alignment on remaining 2. BOT-2 at initial evaluation: Fine Motor Composite standard score 32 (well below average), Bilateral Coordination subtest scale score 8 (below average).
Assessment
Sophia demonstrates improvement in handwriting legibility — letter sizing accuracy has increased from 40% to 67% of words since initial evaluation 10 weeks ago. Bilateral coordination deficits continue to impact ball skills and fastener management. Motor planning difficulties are consistent with her DCD diagnosis and contribute to slow task completion across academic and self-care activities. Hand fatigue during writing tasks suggests endurance remains a limiting factor. Continued skilled OT is necessary to improve handwriting speed and legibility, advance fastener independence, and build bilateral coordination for age-appropriate play.
Plan
Continue OT 2x/week for 45 minutes. Next session: introduce zipper practice on dressing frame, progress ball toss to 7 feet. Home program: 5 minutes of letter writing practice on highlighted paper daily, button practice on pajama tops each night. Discuss classroom accommodations with teacher (extra time for written assignments, reduced copying from board). Re-assess BOT-2 Fine Motor Composite at 6-month mark.

Early Intervention Documentation (IFSP)

If you work with infants and toddlers (birth to age 3), documentation looks different from clinic- or school-based notes. You write under an Individualized Family Service Plan (IFSP) instead of an IEP. The language shifts from child-focused to family-centered — you describe what the family wants the child to do, not just what the therapist wants to work on.

  • IFSP goals are written in family language. For example: "Marcos will pick up Cheerios from his high-chair tray and bring them to his mouth during meals" — not "Improve pincer grasp."
  • Sessions often happen in the home. Your note should describe the natural environment and how you coached the caregiver to support the child's development.
  • Progress is measured against developmental milestones, not grade-level standards. Reference tools like the PDMS-2 or PEDI for children under 3.
  • Service coordination notes may be required. Document any communication with the service coordinator, pediatrician, or other early intervention team members.

The biggest difference is tone. Early intervention notes read less like clinical records and more like coaching summaries. You write about what the family practiced, what the caregiver learned, and what the child did during everyday routines.

Here is an example of an IFSP-style goal versus a clinic-style goal for the same skill. IFSP: "During mealtime, Aiden will use a palmar grasp to pick up soft foods from his tray and bring them to his mouth for 3 consecutive meals, as reported by his caregiver." Clinic: "Patient will demonstrate a raking grasp to self-feed soft solids with minimal assistance in 4 of 5 trials." Both are valid — but the IFSP version uses family language and a natural routine as the measurement context.

OTPF-4 and Pediatric Documentation

The Occupational Therapy Practice Framework, 4th Edition (OTPF-4) is the profession's guiding document. It defines what occupational therapy is, what we treat, and how we think about our work. Your documentation should reflect its language — not because payers require it, but because it keeps your clinical reasoning clear.

In pediatrics, the areas of occupation you will reference most often are:

  • Play — the primary occupation of childhood. Document what play skills the child is developing (exploratory, constructive, pretend, rule-based).
  • Education — handwriting, scissor use, desk posture, participation in classroom routines.
  • Social participation — turn-taking, sharing, reading social cues, participating in group activities.
  • Activities of daily living (ADLs) — dressing, feeding, grooming, toileting.

When you write your Assessment section, use OTPF-4 language to describe the child's occupational performance. Instead of "Billy has poor fine motor skills," write "Billy demonstrates reduced fine motor precision and hand strength impacting his performance in education (letter formation) and ADLs (buttoning, zipper management)." This shows clinical reasoning and ties directly to meaningful occupations.

The OTPF-4 also emphasizes client factors (body functions and structures), performance skills (motor, process, social interaction), and performance patterns (habits, routines, roles). Using this language consistently helps you articulate why skilled OT is necessary and how the child's deficits impact their daily life — exactly what payers and IEP teams want to see.

Medicaid Documentation Requirements for Pediatric OT

Many pediatric OT clients are covered by Medicaid. Medicaid has strict documentation rules, and denied claims are often the result of notes that lack specific details. Here are the key requirements to keep in mind.

  1. 1Medical necessity. Every note must show that the child needs skilled OT — not just enrichment or educational support. Describe the deficit, explain why it requires a trained therapist, and connect it to a functional limitation.
  2. 2Prior authorization. Many states require prior authorization before starting OT services. Your evaluation must include standardized test scores, a clear list of deficits, and specific, measurable goals.
  3. 3Functional reporting. Medicaid wants to see progress in functional terms. Instead of "improved tripod grasp," write "Child now holds a crayon with a functional tripod grasp and copies 3 of 4 basic shapes independently, up from 1 of 4 at evaluation."
  4. 4Credentials and signatures. Every note must include your full name, credentials (OTR/L or COTA/L), signature, date of service, and — if you are a COTA — the supervising OTR's co-signature within the required timeframe.

Missing any of these details can delay or deny payment. Build them into your template so they are automatic, not afterthoughts.

Medicaid audit tip

Keep a checklist at the bottom of your note template: medical necessity stated? Functional outcome linked? Credentials and signature present? Diagnosis code matches the treatment? Running through this 10-second checklist before you sign can save you hours of rework after an audit.

Tips for Writing Faster Pediatric OT Notes

Pediatric therapists often carry heavy caseloads — 30 or more children per week in a school setting. Here are practical ways to write faster without cutting quality.

  • Use a consistent template. Pick one template (like the one above) and use it for every note. Your brain fills in the sections faster when the structure never changes.
  • Write during transitions. While the child moves to the next station or washes hands, jot 2–3 key data points (assist level, reps, cues needed). A 10-second note during the session saves 3 minutes after.
  • Pre-build phrase banks. Create a list of your most-used sentences — grasp pattern descriptions, assist levels, and sensory observations — and paste them in, editing the details for each child.
  • Batch similar notes. If you see three fine motor kids in a row, write all three notes back to back. Your brain stays in the same clinical lane.
  • Dictate instead of type. Speaking is 3x faster than typing for most people. Use voice-to-text on your phone or computer between sessions.
  • Try an AI scribe. Augustun for occupational therapy listens to your session in real time and drafts a SOAP note for you. You review, edit, and sign — no more blank-screen dread at the end of the day.

Let an AI Scribe Handle the Note

You became a pediatric OT to help kids — not to spend your evenings writing notes. Augustun is an ambient AI scribe built for occupational therapists. It listens to your session, identifies the clinical details, and drafts a structured SOAP note you can review in under a minute. It works with 400+ EHR systems, is HIPAA and GDPR compliant, and never stores your recordings. The note is yours. The time you save is yours, too.

AI-Powered · HIPAA-Ready

Spend Less Time on Notes, More Time With Your Kids

Augustun drafts pediatric OT SOAP notes in real time — accurate, compliant, and ready for your review. [Try Augustun free →](/specialties/occupational-therapy)

No credit card required.

Private by design

Augustun is HIPAA and GDPR compliant. Audio recordings are processed in real time and never stored. Your patient data stays between you and your EHR.

Final Thoughts

Pediatric OT documentation does not have to be painful. Use a consistent template, include caregiver input, tie every activity to a functional goal, and add developmental context. Your notes should tell the story of a child making progress — because that is what you do every single session.

The examples in this guide cover the four most common presentations, but the same principles apply to any pediatric case — feeding disorders, visual perceptual deficits, handwriting programs, and more. Start with the template, add the details that matter, and keep the language simple.

Whether you write your notes by hand, type them at the end of the day, or let an AI scribe handle the first draft, the most important thing is that your documentation reflects the skilled, meaningful work you do with the children and families you serve.

Frequently asked questions

What standardized assessments are used in pediatric OT documentation?

The most common standardized assessments in pediatric OT include the Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency (BOT-2), Peabody Developmental Motor Scales (PDMS-2), Beery Visual-Motor Integration (VMI), Sensory Profile-2, School Function Assessment (SFA), and Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory (PEDI). The tool you choose depends on the child's age and primary area of concern — for example, the Sensory Profile-2 for sensory processing and the BOT-2 for motor coordination.

How do you document sensory processing in OT notes?

Document sensory processing by describing the specific sensory input (tactile, auditory, vestibular, etc.), the child's observable response (avoidance, seeking, distress, regulation), and any standardized measure used (such as the Sensory Profile-2 quadrant scores). In your Objective section, note the type and intensity of input provided and the child's tolerance level. In your Assessment, connect the sensory pattern to functional limitations — for example, tactile defensiveness limiting participation in art activities at school.

What is the difference between an IEP and an IFSP in OT?

An IFSP (Individualized Family Service Plan) is used for children from birth to age 3 in early intervention programs. It is family-centered and written in everyday language. An IEP (Individualized Education Program) is used for children ages 3–21 in school-based settings. It is student-centered and tied to educational performance. OT goals in an IFSP focus on developmental milestones within daily routines, while IEP goals focus on skills the child needs to access and participate in the educational environment.

How often should pediatric OT progress notes be written?

The frequency depends on the setting and payer. In most outpatient clinics, you write a daily SOAP note for every session and a progress summary every 30 days or every 10 visits (whichever comes first). In school-based settings, progress is typically reported each grading period or as specified in the IEP. Early intervention programs usually require progress notes at IFSP review intervals (every 6 months). Always check your state's Medicaid guidelines and your facility's policies for exact requirements.

Can an AI scribe handle pediatric OT documentation?

Yes. AI scribes like Augustun are designed to listen to therapy sessions and generate structured SOAP notes that include caregiver reports, objective data, and assessment language appropriate for pediatric OT. The therapist reviews and edits the draft before signing, keeping full clinical control. Augustun is HIPAA and GDPR compliant, works with over 400 EHR systems, and never stores audio recordings.

AI-Powered · HIPAA-Ready

Spend more time with patients, not paperwork.

Augustun transforms ambient speech into accurate notes — finished before your next session.

No credit card required.

Dr. Medeline Yost

Dr. Medeline Yost

Chief Medical Officer, Augustun

Dr. Medeline Yost is an Internal Medicine physician and an emerging leader in clinical innovation. As Chief Medical Officer at Augustun, she helps shape AI-powered tools that streamline clinical documentation and support physicians in delivering higher-quality care. Her professional interests include medical education, workflow redesign, and the responsible use of AI in healthcare — building systems that let clinicians spend more time with patients and less on administrative tasks.